All American Children Are Above Average Act

Posted: March 19th, 2009 under philosophy, politics, psychology, school.
Tags: , , , ,

Liberal education is a vanishing ideal in the contemporary West. The aim of liberal education is to produce people who go on learning after their formal education has ceased; who think, ask questions, and know how to find answers when they need them. People who are better informed and more reflective are more likely to be considerate than those who are – and who are allowed to remain – ignorant, narrow-minded, selfish, and uncivil in the profound sense that characterizes so much human experience now.

Since the No Child Left Behind Act has been instituted, it has been counterproductive. The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 requires public schools to administer a state-wide standardized test annually to all students, holding them accountable and withholding federal funding if they fail to meet requirements. I am infuriated and bewildered by this law.NCLB: A+

Many opponents of NCLB, including teachers and parents, do not like the idea of the testing that is provided in NCLB. They claim that “standardized testing, which is the heart of NCLB accountability, is deeply flawed and biased for many reasons, and that stricter teacher qualifications have exacerbated the nationwide teacher shortage, not provided a stronger teaching force.”

Deborah White

The No Child Left Behind Act requires that every year schools show Adequate Yearly Progress. They are required to increase the number of students who meet the state testing standards yearly. Every American public school is required to file a ‘report card’ giving an account of how many students from every school have met the state standards.

The National Assessment of Educational Progress recently reported in what has become known as the National Report Card, that the No Child Left Behind Act has failed to improve public school achievement since its implementation in 2002. Statistics show there has been little improvement in student math performance and almost no improvement in reading. There has been more improvement at the elementary level than there has been at the middle or secondary levels. The act has not reduced the gap that separates low income and students of color from the rest of the school population. The report card implies that many states have set their standards too low and that little has been done to assure all students qualified and experienced teachers.

Megan Fitzpatrick

Bubble Sheet

Gifted students are being overlooked as many gifted services are being eliminated. They are spending more time reviewing for tests and learning how to take them and less time being challenged. Because of NCLB emphasis on achieving proficiency, curricula does not support advanced needs of these students.

After working in education for 20 years as a teacher, coordinator, and professor, I attended my very first parent-teacher conference as a parent. My daughter attended kindergarten, and I was eager to learn about her performance in school. Her teacher had taught kindergarten for more than 20 years and had a magical way of making her class of 22 five-year-olds feel comfortable and happy. When it came time for our conference, I pulled the primary-sized chair up to the primary-sized desk and sat across from the woman who was my daughter’s first teacher. She calmly explained that my daughter was doing just fine in school, and then proceeded to report how my daughter had performed, based on the state standards identified for kindergartners. She told me that my daughter could count to 10 and that by the end of the year, according to the standards, she would be able to count to 100. I quietly asked if she had ever asked my daughter to count to 100 and was told, “No, that standard isn’t expected until spring.” She went on to explain that I had nothing to worry about because my daughter had met all the standards. In other words, the teacher was communicating that she had done her job. Never mind that my daughter had impressive mathematical skills prior to kindergarten. The teacher had not checked out her existing skills or knowledge. Her job was to address the standards as dictated by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, commonly known as NCLB.

In fact, my daughter could count, add, subtract, and explain fractions and negative numbers among other benchmarks that did not exist in the state standards for kindergartners. She asked me one day, “Would it be a tragedy if a person spent an entire day on the planet and didn’t learn anything new?” I had to agree. As a second grader she continues to ask when she will be given some hard work. However, I wonder how many more years she will still want hard work.

In another school that I visited, the principal had a consultant work with her staff for 2 days on “Strategies for Increasing Your School’s Test Scores.” This consultant explained to a group of concerned inner-city, teachers that they need not worry about the students who scored in the bottom quartile or about the students who scored in the top quartile, because the students in the middle had the power to improve the most. She encouraged the teachers to give these “middle” students the most attention if they wanted to improve their scores. In effect, the district and administration used taxpayer dollars to give the teachers permission not only to leave behind the lowest-scoring children, but also to ignore the highest-scoring students.

Marcia Gentry, Ph.D., associate professor of educational studies and associate director of the Gifted Education Resource Institute, Purdue University.

This is a problem we have been dealing with since my daughters started school. We have been incredibly frustrated with the lack of challenge offered through the education system. Hillary Clinton stated in a rally we attended last year that “we are living in an increasingly personalized, customized world,” and that “education is still an industrial model.” Gentry’s examples provide little hope for students who may need extended, accelerated, or enriched curricula, or for the teachers who might be willing to provide such modifications for their students. NCLB is, in effect, creating a climate of controlled learning and sending a message to administrators, teachers, students, and parents that the school’s job involves teaching to the standards–nothing more and nothing less. When students meet the standards, the schools have met their obligation to “educate.”

Another problem with NCLB is that schools are so concerned with making the grade in math and reading that they are pulling resources away from the arts, physical education and foreign languages to make it happen. But these subjects are vital to the well-rounded student. Art classes, for instance, enhance the creative and innovative thinking that drives entrepreneurs. Studies have found that art classes can help students’ performance in other subjects and could even raise test scores. For instance, dance movement can be used to help a child learn rhythm and meter in reading classes, while singing can enrich the memorization of multiplication tables.

Arizona superintendent of public instruction Tom Horne stated “You cannot run a complex, continent-wide education system through micromanagement by people living in an ivory tower at the Department of Education in Washington.” Perhaps the federal government should step back.

NCLB: BushThese standardized tests are flawed. We need to consider other factors as to the determining the success of schools, such as graduation rates, turn-over of students going to college, and level of positive community involvement from students. We need to hold the educators responsible. Get rid of teachers’ unions and offer competitive salaries to secure the best teachers.

Perhaps a more appropriate title for the act would be: “No Child Gets Ahead,” “No Child Left Untested,” “All American Children Are Above Average Act,” or “The Act to Help Children Read Gooder.”

Young children need to engage in the process of learning to think and to know how to find and use information when needed. Education involves refining capacities for judgment and evaluation. Learning is only a means to an end – which is understanding – and understanding is the ultimate value in education.


  1. Brilliant, Kirsten. Amazing. I’m passionate about this subject, too.

    My recent experience with Jenna’s teachers leaves me quite frustrated!

    Comment by brentdanley — March 19, 2009 @ 8:44 am

  2. The Feds should be more involved, not less. The current tests ARE local. The problem with localized tests is that they create a “race to the bottom”. To improve scores all one district has to do is lower the standard.

    The DoE needs to set the standard. And that standard should be much higher than most are now.

    I’m not sure how constructive it is, but I like what a commenter had to say at the NY Times site:

    The problem with the education system is NOT the teachers but our pop culture parents who are constantly on the go, too much TV, video games and no down time or family time. Then they wonder how come their child cannot focus or read and blame it on the school.

    Hear, hear. We will not have an adequate education system until we, as a nation, begin to value intelligence. Few American adults read as little as one book per year. Newspapers are facing bankruptcy all over the country as subscription rates have plummeted.

    We gorge ourselves with American Idol and smugly believe god created the world 6,000 years ago and that horoscopes tell us something about ourselves.

    Comment by brentdanley — March 19, 2009 @ 10:07 am

  3. Brent, thank you. I see what you mean about the problem with having different standards for different areas.

    I agree, we do not value intelligence enough. I like your last line. It so sums up the problem with our nation!

    Comment by Kirsten Uhler — March 19, 2009 @ 10:35 am

  4. Amazingly our daughter took out the cable when her daughter turned 1.5 years old. said she didn’t want TV to play a part of their lives except for the Einstein series which our grand daughter watched eargerly. Our daughter-in-law has a masters in school psychology. I am always amazed at how advanced her two kids are in every way. No Child Left Behind seemed to imply that no child would be allowed to excel.

    Comment by Jim Griggs — June 2, 2009 @ 9:43 pm

  5. @Jim – Exactly! Good for your daughter. There are some good educational television programs here and there, but for the most part I think TV is a mindless and wasteful distraction.

    Comment by Kirsten Uhler — June 4, 2009 @ 2:45 pm

  6. I don’t think a Native Student slhuodn’t be discouraged to learn Native Language. Native Language is almost distinct in some Native communities. I for one didn’t learn my Native Language in the home due to my parents having to attend boarding school all I learned was in Public schools or in community language classes so now I have some knowledge of my language but not all because after I entered high school they took it out of the curriculum.

    Comment by fernaandiita — February 2, 2012 @ 11:44 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment